Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Half of Hawaii's Bottomfishing Restricted Areas Opening Up

A long-simmering dispute over the state’s Bottomfishing Restricted Areas (BRFA’s) between Hawaii’s fishing community and the state’s Department of Natural Resources and fisheries scientists has resulted in a move by the state to open six BRFAs and keep six BRFAs closed.

The state will also increase the recreational daily bag limit for the seven deepwater bottomfish species from a total of five to a total of 10. A voluntary non-commercial reporting option may be included. Monitoring of the BRFAs would continue based on available funding.

The decision by the state to open up the six BRFA’s was announced at the March 21 meeting of the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council (WPRFM) in Guam. The announcement of the decision by Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources chairman William Aila to open the six BRFA’s was made by Alton Miyasaka of the Hawaii Division of Aquatic Resources.

Miyasaka explained that in the BRFAs to remain closed, research has been conducted in four of them for seven years while research may yet be initiated in the other two areas.

Hawaii’s BRFAs are located in both state and federal waters and were created in the 1990s when local depletion of some bottomfish species known as the Deep 7 in the main Hawaiian Islands (MHI) was a concern. Currently, the bottomfish stocks are considered healthy, with no overfishing occurring and no stocks overfished. The Deep 7 bottomfish species include six snappers (Lutjanidae) in the subfamily Etelinae and one grouper (Serranidae), the Hawaiian grouper Hyporthodus quernus.

The WPRFM’s Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) reviewed the recommendations of the MHI Bottomfish Working Group. It was suggested that the Council could open the portions of the BRFAs located within federal waters.

Council Executive Director Kitty Simonds noted that this option was under review and that a number of the National Standards of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) justify the elimination of MHI BRFAs in federal waters.

The SSC had previously recommended that all BRFAs be eliminated in federal waters and the State be encouraged to remove all BRFAs in State waters as well. The SSC said the utility of the BRFAs to manage the bottomfish fishery has been superseded by mandatory annual catch limits (ACLs) that have been established based on the best scientific information available. Subsequent to establishment of the BRFAs in the 1990s, both state and federal fishery managers implemented total allowable catch for bottomfish in 2007 and annual catch limits since 2011. The Council supported its SSC recommendation continuing to call for the removal of the BRFAs within federal waters and encourage that the State removes the BRFAs within state waters.

That recommendation was opposed by SSC member Miyasaka at the time it was made. “The state’s position is that the closed areas provide an extra level of management,” he said. “The federal agencies feel it’s not necessary to have state regulation. They like some of the things we do, but not everything.”

Fishing for bottomfish in federal waters around Hawaii (3-200 nm offshore) is managed under the Fishery Ecosystem Plan for the Hawaiian Archipelago.

To limit fishing mortality and conserve bottomfish stocks at levels that support healthy fisheries, Federal regulations implementing the plan include a quota (annual catch limit) for Deep 7 bottomfish.

The quota is specified each fishing year using the best available scientific information collected by the State of Hawaii and NOAA Fisheries Service, including commercial and non-commercial fishing data and other information, and considers the associated risk of overfishing.

When the quota is reached, all fishing (commercial and non-commercial) for Deep 7 species is prohibited in Federal waters around the MHI for the remainder of the fishing year. There is no prohibition on fishing for other bottomfish species throughout the year. When the quota is reached, the State of Hawaii will also close waters from the shoreline out to three nautical miles (State waters).

The SSC noted that the Makapu`u and Penguin Bank BRFAs, which the State proposes to keep closed, are the most important fishing areas for fishermen from three islands. Their closures have created the greatest economic hardship of all the existing BRFAs for fishermen, as well social interaction issues through the crowding of effort into the remaining open areas.

A fisherman provided public comment noting that the Makapu`u BRFA creates economic burdens and safety concerns because fishermen have to travel further to alternate fishing grounds. He said keeping the BRFA closed due to the existence of a precious coral bed in the area is not justified because fishermen do not fish in the area of the Makapu`u BRFA that includes the bed.

Ed Ebisui, Council vice chair from Hawaii, thanked the State for opening six BRFAs, but said it didn’t go far enough. “We have the ability to be self-sufficient and we fish responsibly … but it doesn’t get us anywhere but more regulations. … I go to Costco and see imports from countries that are unregulated,” he said. “It is ironic that our imports encourage international illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) fishing… The BRFAs have outlived their usefulness,” he added.

This will not be the first time the number of Hawaii’s BRFA’s has been cut back. There were originally 19 BRFA’s established in 1998, that number was cut to 12 in 2002. The SSC suggested that either a stock assessment be made in the BRFAs before they are opened or catch and effort reporting requirements be made for all vessels that fish in these areas after they are opened.

The state has been sponsoring habitat and stock assessment research since the BRFA’s were first established. The cutbacks in the number of BRFA’s were partially the results of that research.

One of the principal methods the state’s researchers have used to determine the effectiveness of the BRFA’s is the use of a baited stereo botcam that is lowered to a depth where it makes video and still recordings of any fish and the surrounding habitat. The botcam has provided the researchers data about the types of fish that can be found in the differing habitats at depth.

“We looked at seven years of data before we made the decision to cut back,” said Miyasaka. “We had thoroughly surveyed four areas out of twelve, we had varying degrees of data on those four and we want to do more research.”

The main criticism of using the botcam data to justify maintaining the closed BRFA’s to fishing has been Charles Daxboeck, SSC chair. There is no baseline for the research, he said, noting that should have been done when the BRFAs were established. At this point, to establish a baseline, Daxboeck said, the areas should be opened and fished with both commercial and non-commercial fishermen reporting their catches.

The SSC recommended in their June 2013 meeting that a simulation study be conducted to examine whether or not the exclusion of the BRFAS from the bottomfish stock assessment affects the results. When the SSC recommended BRFAs there was no other management process to address overfishing of bottomfish. Since then, the fishery has been stringently managed through Annual Catch Limits.

The SSC recommends that Council staff develop a process for future treatment of the BRFAs including eliminating some or all of the BRFAs, and developing a monitoring program. This should be developed through the Council process, including consultation with experienced deep bottom fishermen of Hawaii.

Big Cut Urged on Hard Cap for King Salmon Bycatch

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council was urged today to move forward with an analysis of Chinook salmon bycatch, and develop a problem statement aimed at dramatically reducing the hard cap on these prized fish.

The request came in a letter from the Yukon River Drainage Fisheries Association, the Bering Sea Fishermen’s Association, the Association of Village Council Presidents, the Tanana Chiefs Conference, in Fairbanks and Kawerak Inc., in Nome.

The council’s summer meeting will be held in Nome June 2-10.

“In light of the declines in Western Alaska Chinook salmon stocks, and the severe impacts on Western Alaskans as a critical source of food, income and culture has disappeared, it is imperative that mortality from bycatch in the pollock fishery is reduced as well,” the group told the NPFMC.

“While the cause of the declines is unclear, in-river users are making extreme sacrifices and in some areas have had their harvest reduced to zero. In this situation, literally every Chinook counts, and it is both a conservation need and a matter of equity to ensure that bycatch is reduced as well.  The ultimate goal of bycatch reduction should be zero, and we should be striving toward this goal.”

The group urged the federal fisheries council to consider two alternatives.

The first would reduce the overall hard cap and performance standards under the current Amendment 91 structure, reducing the overall hard cap from 60,000 to 20,000 kings, and the performance standard/cap without incentive programs from 47,591 to 14,500 fish.

The second alternative sought would provide regulatory provisions to shorten the pollock season end dates when Chinook salmon rates increase while pollock catch rates decline in late September and October.

Harvests Increasing in Copper River Fishery, With Processors Keeping Pace

The famed Copper River wild salmon fishery, on the heels of a slow start, is picking up speed, with the state’s official estimate of the catch now at 361,000 fish, including 338,000 red, 3,000 king, 19,000 chum and fewer than 1,000 silver and pink salmon.

You can follow the daily catch report updates online with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game blue sheet at

Some 500 drift gillnet permit owners are currently participating in the fishery, and there are no reports of processing capacity problems, state fisheries officials said.

At Cordova’s Ocean Beauty Seafoods facilities, plant manager Michael Clutter said his company is “pretty happy” with the progress of the fishery.

The fourth opener, a 24-hour period, proved marginally better than the third opener, with averages up, not dramatically, but improved, he said.

While harvest estimates on that opener were still being calculated today, ADF&G has announced a 36-hour opener to begin on May 29.

Jeremy Botz of ADF&G’s Cordova office said that while the weather has been fairly decent, overcast, and temperatures in the low 50s, the salmon are spread out, a situation that has somewhat slowed the harvest.

Prices on king salmon were holding steady at $35.95 a pound for fillets or $25.95 a pound for whole fish in Anchorage, while at Pike Place Fish Market in Seattle, whole kings are $35.99 a pound and fillets $47.99 a pound.

Sockeye prices at Pike Place are $79.95 a fish and $25.99 a pound for fillets, while in Anchorage they have dropped to $12.95 a pound for whole fish and $17.95 a pound for the fillets.

Genetically Modified Salmon, If Approved, Would Need Identification Label

There’s no decision yet from the US Food and Drug Administration on whether to allow genetically modified salmon to be sold to the public, but if  it is, that product would have to be specifically labeled as different from wild salmon.

The Senate Appropriations Committee this week approved an amendment in the federal agriculture spending legislation to require labeling of the product.  Among those backing the amendment were Alaska Senators Lisa Murkowski and Mark Begich.  Both strongly oppose the product, which they call “Frankenfish.”

“This would be the first time ever that the FDA has approved for human consumption a genetically engineered fish,” Murkowski said.

“This is an experiment that, if it went wrong, could be absolutely devastating to the wild healthy stocks that swim off the coast of Alaska, up past California, Oregon and Washington state, she said.

“What this does is it takes a transgenic Atlantic salmon egg, which has genes from an ocean pout, somewhat akin to an eel, and it combines with the genes of a Chinook salmon. …. This experiment I think puts at risk the health of our fisheries not only in Alaska, but throughout the Pacific Northwest.”

Murkowski noted that to date more than 1.5 million people have written in opposition to approval of the genetically tweaked salmon, and 65 supermarkets have said they won’t carry it.”

An aide to Murkowski said he anticipates a final vote on the matter this summer in Congress, before the 2015 fiscal year begins.

China Lifts Ban on Washington State Geoducks

China has notified the US Trade Representative’s office that it has lifted a ban on the import of Washington State geoducks, news that has met with the approval of Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-WA.

Cantwell issued a statement in late May saying this is great news for the shellfish industry, which is a vital part of the maritime economy in Washington state and supports thousands of jobs.

“Since most of our geoduck exports go to China, this will be a major step forward,” Cantwell said.

The ban, which was lifted for Washington in mid-May, had been in effect since Dec. 2, 2013. The ban included geoducks and other bivalve seafood products, including oysters, clams and mussels from Washington, Oregon, Northern California and Alaska.

Geoducks are hugely popular in China, where about 90 percent of Puget Sound geoducks are exported.

Chinese officials banned imports after two shipments of geoducks were flagged for potential toxins. US officials disputed the accuracy of the results and found that the shellfish were safe to eat.  They have worked with stakeholders, tribes, academics and Chinese officials to conduct additional monitoring and develop specific seafood testing protocols for geoducks that will be exported to China.

On Dec. 20, Cantwell sent a letter to the US Food and Drug Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the US Trade Representative requesting immediate action to resolve the geoduck ban. Signers included 9 other members of Congress from Washington state, Senators Lisa Murkowski, R-AK, Mark Begich, D-AK, Rep Don Young, R-AK, Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-OR, Rep. Suzanne Bonamici, D-OR, Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-OR, Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D[OR, Rep. Mike Thompson, D-CA, Rep Jared Huffman, D-CA, and Rep. Sam Farr, D-CA.

Washington state’s $270 million shellfish industry supports more than 3,000 jobs in the state’s coastal communities. Shellfish farming is the largest employer in Washington’s Pacific County and is the second largest employer in Mason County.

FN Online Advertising